Prof. Dr. Muhammed Fatih Talu
Abstract: These are the four appendices to the review; each sets out the ground of a group of findings in the main text.
The reference numbers in square brackets ([1], [15] and the like) belong to the bibliography of the review. Quotations from the books, the dictionaries and the preface are given in the Turkish of their printing, with an English translation in square brackets beneath.
This appendix gives three things for each of the thirty-eight verses cited in the main text: where and for what the verse is used in the findings, the note of the Kur'an Yolu Tefsiri [16] on that verse, and the relevant Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı İslâm Ansiklopedisi entry. The texts of the verses are not repeated here; in the main text each of them, from Verse-01 to Verse-38, is given word for word from the Kur'an-ı Kerim Meâli of the Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı [15]. The commentary notes are summarised from the online edition of the Kur'an Yolu Tefsiri, and the encyclopaedia entries were opened and verified in the online edition (accessed: 23 August 2026).
This appendix brings together, for the key terms that carry the findings, every use of them in the books, their dictionary meaning in 1931 and their counterpart in the Qur'an. The counts were made on the hand-corrected full text of the two sections, headings included; the example sentences are word for word and have been machine-checked against the page named in their citation. The dictionary definitions are taken word for word from the Kubbealtı Lugatı [18] and, from the Kamus-ı Türkî (1317/1901) [19], by reading the facsimile image; the second should be confirmed against a printed copy. The verses given as Qur'anic counterparts have been checked against the Turkish rendering used by the review.
This appendix gives the full text of the preface and the drafting-committee pages on which the first section of the review rests. These pages lie outside the hand-corrected corpus; for this appendix the text was copied out by reading the scan and was compared with the OCR output. The orthography is that of the 1931 printing. The preface of Tarih II is the same as that of Tarih I; there are only differences of spelling, shown below in square brackets. The scans are on the site, references [5] and [6]. The Turkish text is given first, and an English translation follows in square brackets.
Tarih I [3]: "Maarif Vekâleti Millî Talim ve Terbiye Dairesinin 2/8/1931 tarih ve 1869 numaralı emrile 30 000 nüsha tab'edilmiştir." [Printed in 30,000 copies by order no. 1869, dated 2/8/1931, of the National Directorate of Instruction and Education of the Ministry of Education.]
Tarih II [4]: "Maarif Vekâleti Millî Talim ve Terbiye Dairesinin 28/11/1931 tarih ve 2847 numaralı emrile 25000 nüsha tab'edilmiştir." [Printed in 25,000 copies by order no. 2847, dated 28/11/1931, of the National Directorate of Instruction and Education of the Ministry of Education.]
Son yıllara gelinceye kadar "Türk Tarihi" memleketimizde en az tetkik edilmiş mevzulardan biri halinde idi. [Until recent years "Turkish History" was one of the least studied subjects in our country.] 1000 yıldan fazla süren İslâmlık - Hıristiyanlık [II: islâmlık - hıristiyanlık] davalarının doğurduğu husumet duygusile mutaassıp müverrihler bu davalarda asırlarca islamlığın piştarlığını [II: islâmlığın pişdarlığını] yapan Türklerin tarihini kan ve ateş maceralarından ibaret göstermeğe savaştılar. Türk ve İslam müverrihler de Türklüğü ve Türk medeniyetini İslamlık ve İslam medeniyeti ile kaynaştırdılar; İslamlığa tekaddüm [II: islâmlığa takaddüm] eden binlerce yıla ait devreleri unutturmayı Ümmetçilik siyasetinin icabı ve din gayreti vecibesi bildiler. Daha yakın zamanlarda Osmanlı İmparatorluğuna dahil bütün unsurlardan tek bir milliyet yaratmak hayalini güden Osmanlılık [II: osmalılık] cereyanı da, Türk adının anılmaması, Millî Tarihin yalnız ihmal değil, hatta yazılmış olduğu sayfalardan [II: sayıfalardan] kazınıp silinmesi yolunda üçüncü bir amil halinde diğerlerine eklendi. [With the feeling of enmity born of the Islam–Christianity contests that lasted more than a thousand years, bigoted historians strove to present the history of the Turks — who for centuries were the vanguard of Islam in those contests — as consisting of nothing but adventures of blood and fire. Turkish and Muslim historians, for their part, fused Turkishness and Turkish civilisation with Islam and Islamic civilisation; they held it a requirement of the politics of the religious community, and an obligation of religious zeal, to have the periods belonging to the thousands of years preceding Islam forgotten. In more recent times the Ottomanist current, which cherished the dream of creating a single nationality out of all the elements contained in the Ottoman Empire, was added to the others as a third factor working towards the non-mention of the Turkish name and towards National History being not merely neglected but even scraped away and erased from the pages on which it had been written.] Bütün bu menfi cereyanlar, tabiî olarak, mektep programları ve mektep kitapları üzerinde dahi tesir gösterdi ve Türklüğün, çadır, aşiret, at, silâh ve muharebe mefhumlarile müradif tutulması an'anesi mektep kitaplarımıza kadar girdi. [All these negative currents naturally exerted their influence upon school curricula and school books as well, and the tradition of holding Turkishness to be synonymous with the notions of the tent, the tribe, the horse, the weapon and the battle made its way even into our school books.] Türk Tarihinin, inkâr edilmiş ve unutturulmuş simasını ve mahiyetini, bütün hakikatlerile meydana çıkarabilmek için çalışmakta olan Türk Tarihi Tetkik Cemiyeti bir kısım azasını tarih tedrisatındaki bu boşluğu doldurabilecek bir kitap hazırlamağa memur etti [The Turkish Historical Research Society, which is working to bring to light, with all its truths, the countenance and the nature of Turkish History that have been denied and made to be forgotten, charged a number of its members with preparing a book capable of filling this gap in the teaching of history] En yeni eserlere ve Anadolu, Mısır, Mezopotamya, Ortaasya, Şimalî Hint, Şimalî Çin ve Cenubî Sibirde her gün [II: hergün] daha ileri götürülmekte olan arkeolojik tetkiklere istinat etmekle beraber mevzuun genişliği, zamanın darlığı yanında, önümüzdeki ders yılına yetiştirilmesi zaruretinin de hâkim bulunması ilcasile, bu küçük eserin ihtiyaca tam ve mükemmel şekilde tekabül edeceği iddia olunamaz. Noksanlar [II: Noksanları], ilerde, yeni basılışlarda tamamlanacaktır. Kitabın ihtiva ettiği mevzular etrafında daha fazla malûmat edinmek isteyenler [II: istiyenler] aynı [II: ayni] heyetin pek yakında bastırılmak üzere hazırladığı Umumî Türk Tarihinin Ana Hatları hakkındaki esere müracaat edebilirler. [Although it rests upon the most recent works and upon the archaeological investigations that are being carried further every day in Anatolia, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Central Asia, Northern India, Northern China and Southern Siberia, it cannot be claimed that this small work meets the need fully and perfectly, given the breadth of the subject and the shortness of the time, and given that the necessity of having it ready for the coming school year also prevailed. The deficiencies will be made good later, in new printings. Those who wish to obtain fuller information on the subjects the book contains may consult the work on the Main Lines of General Turkish History that the same committee has prepared and that is to be printed very shortly.] Cemiyet, dört kitap halinde hazırlamış olduğu bu küçük eseri, mekteplerde okutulmasını kabul eden Türkiye Cümhuriyeti Maarif Vekâletine hediye etmiştir. [The Society has presented this small work, which it has prepared in four books, to the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Turkey, which has accepted that it be taught in the schools.] Cemiyet, Maarif Vekâleti Neşriyat Müdürü Faik Reşit ve Devlet Matbaası Müdürü Hamdi Emin Beylere kitapların basılışındaki kıymetli yardımları için teşekkürü vecibe bilir. [The Society holds it an obligation to thank Faik Reşit Bey, Director of Publications of the Ministry of Education, and Hamdi Emin Bey, Director of the State Press, for their valuable assistance in the printing of the books.]
The titles are given in the wording of the 1931 printing, with an English rendering in square brackets.
| Name | Title in Tarih I | Difference in Tarih II |
|---|---|---|
| Heyet reisi [head of the committee] | Riyaseticümhur Umumî Kâtibi ve Türk Tarihi Tetkik Cemiyeti Reisi [Secretary General of the Presidency of the Republic and President of the Turkish Historical Research Society] | — |
| Samih Rifat Bey | Çanakkale Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Reis Vekili [Deputy for Çanakkale and Vice-President of the Society] | — |
| Akçuraoğlu Yusuf Bey | İstanbul Meb'usu, Ankara Hukuk Mektebi Siyasî Tarih Profesörü ve T. T. T. C. Reis Vekili [Deputy for Istanbul, Professor of Political History at the Ankara School of Law and Vice-President of the Society] | — |
| Reşit Galip Bey | Aydın Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Umumî Kâtibi [Deputy for Aydın and Secretary General of the Society] | "Dr. Reşit Galip Bey" |
| Hasan Cemil Bey | Bolu Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Bolu and member of the Society] | "Balıkesir Meb'usu" [Deputy for Balıkesir] |
| Afet Hanımefendi | Musiki Muallim Mektebi Tarih ve Medenî Bilgiler Muallimi ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Teacher of History and Civics at the Music Teachers' School and member of the Society] | — |
| Baki Bey | Erkânı Harbiye Miralayı, Büyük Erkânı Harbiye Harp Tarihi İkinci Şube Müdürü [Colonel of the General Staff, Director of the Second Branch for War History of the Grand General Staff] | — |
| İsmail Hakkı Bey | Balikesir Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Balıkesir and member of the Society] | — |
| Reşit Saffet Bey | Kocaeli Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Kocaeli and member of the Society] | — |
| Sadri Maksudi Bey | Şarkî Karahisar Meb'usu ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Şarkî Karahisar and member of the Society] | "Ankara Hukuk Mektebi Profesörlerinden" [one of the professors of the Ankara School of Law] added |
| Şemseddin Bey | Sıvas Meb'usu ve İstanbul Darülfünunu Türk Tarihi Sabık Profesörü ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Sivas, former Professor of Turkish History at the University of Istanbul and member of the Society] | — |
| Şemsi Bey | Miralay, Harita Umum Müdürlüğü Harita Şubesi Müdürü [Colonel, Director of the Map Branch of the General Directorate of Maps] | — |
| Yusuf Ziya Bey | Eskişehir Meb'usu, İstanbul Darülfünunu Hukuk Tarihi Sabık Profesörü ve T. T. T. C. Azası [Deputy for Eskişehir, former Professor of Legal History at the University of Istanbul and member of the Society] | — |
This appendix shows, for each of the nineteen findings, the claim it attributes to the books and the sentences from which that claim comes. The type column makes two distinctions: explicit — the claim is present word for word in the books' wording; combination — the claim is built by bringing together more than one explicit sentence. Where a claim is a combination, the finding is obliged to show in its own text which sentences it is built from. The Qur'anic side of the findings falls outside this table: that is the criterion the review declares, not a claim attributed to the books.
| Finding | Claim attributed to the books | Ground | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | The birth of religion is tied to a human chain | The sequence of subheadings; "they invented", "this is the origin of", "we give the name of religion" | explicit |
| 02 | Religion, "like the other social institutions", is a human construction | Quote-05 (word for word) | explicit |
| 03 | Divinity is a concept built by human intelligence and reduced to nature | The book says "found / discovered"; the claim comes from the combination of Quote-10, Quote-01 and Quote-13 | combination |
| 04 | The principle covers the whole of the unseen | The book says "all concepts above and outside nature" (Quote-10); "the unseen" is the review's term | combination |
| 05 | Primitive man has no religion; oneness comes later | Quote-11, Quote-12, Quote-13 — repeated without qualification in three places | explicit |
| 06 | The judgement is not descriptive but normative | "it must be accepted", "in any case" (Quote-15) | explicit |
| 07 | The origin is tied to nature; no agent outside nature is mentioned | Quote-15, Quote-16, Quote-17 | explicit |
| 08 | The book does not transmit the claim of evolution but adopts it | "it becomes impossible not to accept" (Quote-22), "In sum (…) they came" (Quote-19) | explicit |
| 09 | The divine source belongs to a note of transmission, the human explanation to the book's own voice | The structure of the qualifiers in Quote-23 and Quote-24 | explicit (structural) |
| 10 | The verses are "the product of reflections over a long period" | Quote-24, Quote-25, Quote-26 (word for word) | explicit |
| 11 | The Prophet is a "founder"; the description of proclamation is declared an "error" | Quote-28, Quote-29, Quote-30 | explicit |
| 12 | The same pattern is extended to the whole of prophethood | Quote-31 is the only instance; the extension is built with the book's general thesis (Quote-05, Quote-34) | combination |
| 13 | The origin of belief in the jinn is culture | Quote-33: "Muhammad too (…) sincerely believed" | explicit |
| 14 | Belief in angels is nowhere recounted as truth | The qualifiers of Quote-23, Quote-34, Quote-35 and Quote-37 | explicit (structural) |
| 15 | The Kaʿba narrative is declared "fabricated tales" | Quote-37: "All of these are, naturally, tales fabricated afterwards" | explicit |
| 16 | Sacredness is tied to a human and political ground | Quote-38, Quote-39, Quote-40 | explicit |
| 17 | The perpetuity of the rulings is removed | The first sentence of Quote-42 (explicitness) and Quote-44 | explicit |
| 18 | The praise remains within human categories | Quote-45, Quote-46; eight favourable sentences on pp. 90–93 | explicit |
| 19 | "He supposed it revelation; what he said was the product of his own reflection" | The entailment of Quote-26 together with Quote-35 | combination |
In four findings (03, 04, 12, 19) the claim is built by combination, and in all four the finding says so in its own text. The single note on terminology, in Finding 04, is this: the field the book calls "all concepts above and outside nature" has been named in the review by the term "the unseen" (gayb).
Two sentences that do not appear in the table are not claims attributed to the books but assessments of the review itself, and are written as such in the findings: the judgement in Finding 03 that this "is a denial of divinity", and the sentence in Finding 11 that "the dilemma the book sets up is false".
This document, together with the review itself and its source text, has been released into the public domain under CC0 1.0.